Low Visibility Approach Minima

Hard4 min readOperational Procedures
Moderately Examined
Why this matters

Understanding low visibility approach minima is essential for safe operations in adverse weather, reducing the risk of accidents during approach and landing, and ensuring compliance with strict regulatory and procedural requirements.

Low visibility approach minima define the lowest weather conditions—specifically runway visual range (RVR) and decision height (DH)—in which an approach and landing may be safely conducted. These minima are crucial for Category II and III precision approaches, where visibility can be extremely limited. Operators, aircraft, crew, and aerodromes must all be specially approved and equipped to operate below standard minima.

Quick Check

What must a pilot-in-command verify before commencing a low visibility approach at an aerodrome?

AI Tutor

Go beyond the textbook.

    Ask Avi AI about Low Visibility Approach Minima
    In depth

    Explanation

    What is Low Visibility Approach Minima?

    Low visibility approach minima set the minimum RVR and DH values for safe approach and landing when visibility is reduced, such as in fog, heavy rain, or snow. For precision approaches, especially Category II (CAT II) and Category III (CAT III), these minima allow operations in conditions where standard visual cues are unavailable or severely restricted.

    Categories and Minima

    • CAT I: DH not lower than 200 ft and RVR not less than 550 m
    • CAT II: DH lower than 200 ft but not lower than 100 ft, RVR not less than 300 m
    • CAT IIIA: DH lower than 100 ft or no DH, RVR not less than 200 m
    • CAT IIIB: No DH or DH lower than 50 ft, RVR not less than 75 m
    • CAT IIIC: No DH and no RVR limitation (not currently in operational use)

    Operational Requirements

    • The aerodrome, aircraft, and crew must all be specifically approved for low visibility operations.
    • The operator’s procedures must ensure all required equipment is serviceable and that LVPs (Low Visibility Procedures) are active at the aerodrome.
    • The pilot-in-command must verify all operational criteria, including crew qualifications, equipment status, and aerodrome readiness, before commencing a low visibility approach.
    • Height callouts below 200 ft must use the radio altimeter, and at least one pilot must continuously monitor instruments until landing is complete.

    Aerodrome and Crew Considerations

    • Only aerodromes with approved low visibility procedures may be used for CAT II/III approaches.
    • Crew must be simulator-trained and checked for the specific operation and aircraft type.
    • Any changes in ground or airborne equipment status can affect the applicable minima and may require reverting to higher minima or discontinuing the approach.

    Key Procedures

    • If RVR drops below minima before 1000 ft above the aerodrome, the approach must not be continued beyond that point.
    • If RVR drops below minima after passing 1000 ft, the approach may continue to DA/H or MDA/H, but landing may only occur if required visual references are obtained at or above minima.
    • The minimum required visual references must be clearly defined and known to the crew.

    Take-off Minima

    • Take-off minima are also expressed as visibility or RVR, with specific requirements for low visibility take-offs (LVTO) below 400 m RVR, requiring special operator approval and procedures.
    The essentials

    Key Points

    Low visibility approach minima specify the lowest RVR and DH for safe approach and landing.
    CAT II and CAT III approaches allow operations in much lower visibility than standard CAT I.
    Aerodrome, aircraft, crew, and operator must all be approved for low visibility operations.
    LVPs must be in force at the aerodrome for CAT II/III approaches.
    Height callouts below 200 ft must be made using the radio altimeter.
    Minima can change if ground or airborne equipment status changes.
    Take-off minima are also based on visibility or RVR, with LVTO requiring special approval below 400 m.
    Watch out

    Exam Traps & Typical Mistakes

    Confusing cloud base with visibility/RVR—only RVR/visibility is considered for approach minima, not cloud base.
    Assuming you can continue an approach below 1000 ft if RVR drops below minima—this is not permitted.
    Believing all airports can support CAT II/III minima—only specifically approved aerodromes may be used.
    Thinking visual references are not required at minima—landing is only allowed if required visual cues are obtained.
    Assuming any pilot can conduct low visibility approaches—specific crew training and qualification are mandatory.
    Test yourself

    Example Exam Questions

    Question 2Hard

    Which of the following is the lowest approach minima typically associated with CAT IIIb operations?

    Question 3Medium

    When is an operator required to implement low visibility procedures at an aerodrome?

    Still not fully confident?

    Deepen your knowledge with an AI tutor built specifically for EASA ATPL students.

    Built from thousands of ATPL knowledge references, real exam references and official learning objectives.

    Open Avi AI Tutor
    Keep going

    Related Concepts

    Still have questions?

    Ask questions in plain English and get exam-focused explanations from an AI tutor built specifically for EASA ATPL students.

    Open Avi AI